In politics, I pride myself in being a moderate, open-minded conservative. The vast majority of my core beliefs on legal issues and morality/ethics lean more towards the right. However, I don’t fully agree with everything the right stands for, or has to say for that matter. I do share certain beliefs with the left, and even when I disagree with it I am truly able and willing to hear them out every time.
Tuesday night I got in a heated debate with a co-worker pertaining to a topic which does nothing for the point of this discussion. However, what I got out of this back and forth argument which elicited unnecessary catharses, was a broader understanding and better, more lucid perspective on the faults embedded in the Logic of the Left and Right of many people in this country.
The faults of the Right: You often times implement these stringent standards, often times religion based, of how to live life on people who simply will never perceive the world in the same manner as you do. Moreover, many times you do not abide by your own rules or standards, yet are the first to judge, criticize, and ostracize those who disagree with your perceived notion of what is right or wrong. The sad, yet truthful reality, is that even if what you advocate for is inherently right, you lose credibility and lose a potential following when your actions contradict your words. Examples include, but are not limited to, loving your neighbor, “God loves everyone,” abortion, contraceptives, homosexuality etc.
The faults of the Left: You often times have loosely-knitted standards or value systems that are subject purely and utterly to contemporaneous trends. Moreover, very often, you feel that you are more liberal or open-minded, and consequently, intellectually superior to people with stringent standards. Many times to discredit their points you swiftly go after their hypocrisy or lack of consistency, ostensibly claiming that as a result their logic is folly. However, this is false. Proving someone’s hypocrisy only shows that person to be two-faced. It does not prove that what they said wasn’t intrinsically right. Just because Spitizer slept with a prostitute does that mean that his statements about prostitution being wrong are any less true?
In conclusion, the right has to learn to be consistent with their standards so that they are not being blind hypocrites endeavoring to lead others down the road of salvation; meanwhile, the left has to realize that hypocrisy is not a substantial argument against what a person deems right or wrong.